31B MOS End of Course Critique

Thank you for participating in our training evaluation survey. Please share your feedback by filling in the information below.

First Name

Last Name

Unit

Which course did you attend? *

1. Were you provided with timely notification of your selection to attend the course (i.e. sufficient time to notify your employer)? *

	Less than 1	1-2	3-4	4-6	Greater than 6
Number of months prior?	Less than 1	1-2	3-4	4-6	Greater than 6

2. Were you informed what you were required to bring (packing list)? *

Yes

No

3. Were you informed of what to expect from the course? *

Yes

No

4. How did you rate the clarity of the course standards (5 being the best)? *

	1	2	3	4	5
1 = Unclear, 2 = Unclear, many areas defined, 3 = Clear once clarified, 4 = Clear, 5 = Clear and easily understood	1	2	3	4	5

5. Were you provided a training schedule on arrival? *

Yes

No

6. Rate in-processing (4 being the best). *

	1	2	3	4
1 = Room for Much Improvement, 2 = Room for Improvement, 3 = Satisfactory, 4 = Well organized and efficient	1	2	3	4

7. How would you rate the classroom learning environment (4 being the best)? *

1 = Unsatisfactory learning environment

2 = Less than satisfactory learning environment

3 = Satisfactory learning environment

4 = Highly conducive to learning

8. How would you rate the usefulness of the graphic training aids (4 being the best)? *

1 = Not Useful

2 = Somewhat Useful

3 = Useful

4 = Very Useful

9. Which interested you the most and least? *

10. What would you do to improve this course overall (e.g. add/delete lesson, add/subtract hours, etc.)? *

11. What area of the class did you feel most helped to improve your skills? *

12. Did the course live up to your expectations? *

Yes

No

13. What would you specifically like to see changed in the course? *

14. How would you rate the course you have just completed overall (4 being the best)? *

1 = Dissatisfied

2 = Room for Improvement

3 = Satisfied

4 = Very Satisfied

15. Course/lesson objectives were presented at the beginning of training? *

16. Course content was logically organized. *

17. The level of instruction was appropriate. *

18. Safety was stressed and practiced throughout the course. *

19. Environmental consideration was stressed and practiced throughout the course. *

20. The course was learner centric. *

21. My skill knowledge increased as a result of this course. *

22. I will be able to apply skills learned in this course in future operations of job. *

23. The course provided me ample opportunity to demonstrate initiative. *

24. I was given opportunity to demonstrate my leadership abilities. *

25. Instructors/facilitators demonstrated a thorough grasp of the subject. *

26. Instructors/facilitators were prepared for training. *

27. Instructors/facilitators served as mentors. *

28. When appropriate for training the instructors/facilitators incorporated teamwork and collaboration. *

29. When appropriate for training the instructors/facilitators incorporated learning activities that developed critical thinking and problem solving skills. *

30. The instructors/facilitators professionalism set the proper example for bearing, behavior, and appearance. *

31. The instructors/facilitators related training to the job/operational environment. *

32. Training was realistic and effective. *

33. The lesson objectives were clearly stated. *

34. Course materials and references used for training were current. *

35. The course delivery method was appropriate for training. *

36. The appropriate amount of time was allocated for training. *

37. Gaming and simulation incorporated into the course enhanced training. *

38. Online digital course materials were relevant, useful, and accessible as needed. *

39. The Individual Student Assessment Plan (ISAP) was provided or posted for student access. *

40. Assessment procedures were clearly explained prior to all assessments. *

41. The process for challenging an assessment (reclama procedure) was clearly explained. *

42. Assessments served as a good measurement of the training received. *

43. Post assessment (exam, test, performance evaluation) reviews or After Action Reviews (AARs) were conducted after each assessment. *

44. Training facilities ranges and training areas were conducive to learning. *

45. Classroom or training area was appropriate for training. *

46. Enough equipment, training aids, and/or training materials were on hand to conduct training. *

47. Equipment and training aids used for training worked properly. *

48. There was enough ammunition to complete the task/exercise. *

49. The barracks/on post lodging, lighting, HVAC, climate, internet access, and furnishings were adequate. *

50. The dining facilities (DFAC) food cleanliness and service were adequate. *

51. The library resources and hours met student needs. *

52. The welcome letter and packing list was informative and provided detailed requirements of documents, clothing, and equipment required to attend the course. *

53. Internet access was available and high enough quality to conduct course activities during non-class hours. *

54. Group meeting facilities with internet access were available for small group work outside of class time. *

55. The course included instruction on the use of research, information resources, and other Knowledge Management tools and opportunities to use these resources in the conduct of the course. *

56. What was the MOST valuable part of training and why? *

57. What was the LEAST valuable part of training and why? *

58. Please provide other suggestions or comments to help improve future training classes. *